Reader Poll: MFDA Panel regulations

Staff / February 05, 2010

Article Tools

Print
Print
Text size Text size
Text size


According to the IFB, under current MFDA regulations surrounding Hearings Panels, there is no mechanism to compensate an advisor in any way if the case brought against him or her is found to be without merit.

"Even when a Panel finds in the favour of the advisor, the MFDA can appeal the case requiring the advisor to begin the process again. With no ability to award compensation to the advisor, the advisor is left to bear the full cost of the regulatory action," said IFB executive director, John Whaley.

Also, recent amendments to MFDA By-Law No. 1 permits Panels to hold hearings without notifying the advisor.

What are your thoughts on these regulations?

• • •

  • What has your experience been? Have your say in our forums by clicking here.

  • Filed by Staff, editor@advisor.ca

    Originally published on Advisor.ca

    Article Tools

    Print
    Print
    Text size Text size
    Text size


    Advisor.ca@10Years

    tools

    ETF Centre

    ETF Filter Tool
    There is a better way to use ETFs. Search, compare, allocate with the ETF Filter.

    Partner Education

    Partner Success Centre

    We’re celebrating
    Advisor.ca@10.

    Join us

    more…

    Franklin Templeton Investments
    Advisor Group Rogers
    ADVISOR.CA:
    » Customer Service / Contact Us / Sales & Advertising / Privacy / Terms of Use / Conseiller.ca
    » AM/PM Bulletins / RSS Feeds / Conferences / Subscribe to Print
    » Advisor’s Edge Past Issues / Advisor’s Edge Report Past Issues

    ROGERS FINANCIAL SERVICES NETWORK:
    » Benefits Canada / Canadian Investment Review / Canadian Insurance / Canadian Institutional Investment Network