Canadian investors need more tech in their stock portfolios, regardless of risk tolerance.

Canadians are impacted by the same technology and consumer influences as the U.S., yet Canadian stock indexes are dominated by financial services and natural resources: 35.2% and 30.4%, respectively, of the S&P TSX Capped Composite Index. Information technology represents only 3.5%, compared with 24% of the S&P 500 Index.

Since the global financial crisis, oil prices have declined 48% in U.S. dollar terms. An accompanying 20% decline in the Canadian dollar (vs. the U.S. dollar) contributed to the S&P/TSX Composite returning a modest 5% annually over the 10 years ended Jan. 31, 2018.

Yet in CAD terms, the S&P 500 returned 9% annually over the same period, and the technology-rich NASDAQ Composite Index (CAD-hedged) returned a stunning 15.5% annually.

The case for more technology exposure

  1. Capital, labour and innovation are the three engines of economic expansion.
  2. Investors buy stocks to participate in economic growth.
  3. Technology is an increasingly important driver of productivity gains. Research from Oxford University and PwC tell us technology will significantly impact 38% of all U.S. jobs and 61% of all financial services jobs by 2030.

Investors of all ages and risk tolerances looking for capital gains or an offset to inflation should consider adding more technology than the 3.5% represented in Canadian indexes.

Volatility and concentration

Volatility and concentration are common excuses for limiting exposure to tech indexes. The 10-year daily volatility of the tech-heavy NASDAQ 100 was higher than the S&P 500—24.8% vs. 21.6%—but has been the same for the last five years, at 16.8%. The five largest stocks—Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Facebook, and Alphabet—account for 44% of the NASDAQ 100, but that’s similar to the 40.9% financials concentration in the S&P/TSX 60.

Canada’s expanding technology sector still lacks depth. Nortel and BlackBerry remind investors about the hazards of concentration. The iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT) launched in March 2001 with 20 companies and dwindled to only five by 2009. XIT’s 10-year performance has been better than the broader Canadian indices, but with fewer than 10 holdings from 2007 to 2013, the return requires an asterisk.

XIT’s largest five stocks (CGI, Constellation Software, Shopify, Open Text, and Blackberry) also offer a different vibe than those in the U.S.: leading U.S. companies present integrated and multifaceted technology opportunities that address consumer, commercial and industrial applications.

Horizons Robotics and Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and Evolve Automobile Innovation Index ETF (CARS) are new specialized products. Blockchain ETFs are also coming, but rules and definitions are still being established for this frontier technology.

First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) has registration pending in Canada (BLCK). Evolve Blockchain ETF (LINK) and Harvest Blockchain Technologies ETF (HBLK) have launched active funds in Canada. Make sure to review index and sponsor integrity, as they are important factors in ETF viability.

Combining a Canadian ETF (which has more financials and less technology), with a NASDAQ 100 or other technology ETF (which has zero financials and more technology) can improve diversification. Use a low-volatility ETF like BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity (ZLB) to reduce risk if that is a concern.

Note, however, that there is no free lunch. In 2000, tech represented more than 30% of the S&P 500 (it was 8% in 1990). In the same year, Nortel represented over 36% of the TSX 300 Composite—that’s why they capped it. Overexuberance warrants monitoring, but more tech is still better than less.

Table 1: Tech indexes (as of Jan. 31, 2018)

Index Info tech P/E ratio 1 yr return 3 yr CAG 5 yr CAG
U.S. NASDAQ 100 Index (CAD hedged) 60.3% 27.7 36.7% 19.8% 22.1%
S&P 500 (CAD hedged) 24.0% 23.9 25.6% 14.1% 15.8%
S&P 500 Info Tech Index (total return) 100% 26.4 43.1% 23.3% 22.4%
StrataQuant Technology Index 100% 26.0 33.4% 17.51%
Global Robo Global Robotics and Automation Index 100%* 30.11 45.7%* 18.0%*
Solactive Future Cars Index 55% 23.8 32.7% 21.6% 23.9%
Canada S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index 3.5% 18.0 6.7% 5.9% 7.9%
S&P/TSX 60 Index 3.1% 18.1 6.9% 6.4% 8.6%
S&P/TSX Capped Information Tech Index 100% 19.6 23.4%** 12.4%** 20.6%**
* as of Dec. 31, 2017  **fewer than 10 holdings from 2007 to 2011

Table 2: Tech ETFs

ETF Benchmark MER
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity CAD (ZQQ) NASDAQ 100 Index (CAD hedged) .39
iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD (XQQ) NASDAQ 100 Index (CAD hedged) .39
Powershares QQQ Index ETF CAD (QQC.F) NASDAQ 100 Index (CAD hedged) .33
Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index (HXQ) NASDAQ 100 Index (unhedged CAD) .27
Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index USD (HXQ.U) NASDAQ 100 Index (USD) .27
Horizons Robotics and Automation Index CAD (ROBO) Robo Global Robotics and Automation Index .85
First Trust AlphaDex U.S. Technology Sector Index CAD (FHQ.F) StrataQuant Technology Index (CAD hedged) .77
First Trust AlphaDex U.S. Technology Sector Index (FHQ) StrataQuant Technology Index .77
First Asset Tech Giants Covered Call CAD (TXF) S&P 500 Info Tech Index (total return CAD) .65
First Asset Tech Giants Covered Call (TXF.B) S&P 500 Info Tech Index (total return) .65
Evolve Automobile Innovation Index ETF (CARS) Solactive Future Cars Index .55
Tech Achievers Growth and Income ETF (HTA) N/A (based on 20 equally weighted stocks) (CAD) .85
Tech Achievers Growth and Income ETF USD (HTA.U) N/A (based on 20 equally weighted stocks) (USD) .85

Mark Yamada is President of PÜR Investing Inc., a software development firm. Disclosure: PÜR Investing Inc. provides risk-based model portfolios to Horizons ETFs.

Originally published in Advisor's Edge

See all comments Recent Comments

TJ Machado

There is one relatively easy solution to addressing the lack of depth in the Canadian Market. The Canadian Sector ETFs should spread their scope across the entire Canadian market and not just limit themselves to the TSX Capped Index participants. Canadian investors desperately need better sector specific exposure to fight the inherent resource and financials bias. Unfortunately we do not have the requisite building blocks to get a total market exposure while choosing our personal sector exposure. There is a real disconnect between ETF manufacturers and the portfolio construction community locally.

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2018 at 4:38 pm Reply

Add a comment

Have your say on this topic! Comments are moderated and may be edited or removed by
site admin as per our Comment Policy. Thanks!