When presented with a POA document, Harold Geller, a civil litigator with Ottawa-based Doucet McBride LLP, says advisors should focus on a few basics.

“These include taking steps to verify its validity and that it complies with minimum requirements of provincial POA legislation, and ensuring that the person presenting it is who they say they are.”

Read: Dealing with POA abuse

There is still no specific law or industry rule requiring advisors perform this rudimentary investigation.

And, Geller says, advisors should be doing more, including maintaining detailed records of all client interactions with clients, and taking steps to verify their client’s incompetency.

“Advisors should always stand their ground on behalf of their clients’ best interests,” he adds.

Rona Birenbaum, a CFP with Caring for Clients in Toronto, says when someone presents her with a POA, she tries to reach the client. If she can’t, she asks the designated POA to provide written instructions from the client, or request confirmation from a physician or lawyer saying the client is legally incapable of managing his or her own property.

It’s important to plan for incapacity, and advisable to broach the topic early so it becomes a dialogue about life and choices, rather than death and old age. If you wait until a client shows signs of diminished capacities, he might not be legally capable of drafting a POA.

Read: Why wills are not enough

Lynne Butler, senior will and estate planner at Scotia Private Client Group, says it’s essential to use a customized POA and not rely on boilerplate versions available on provincial web sites or through lawyers.

These custom versions should include checks and balances such as:

  • naming more than one person as the POA;
  • including a clause specifying financial statements be periodically sent to the client’s accountant or lawyer for review and to ensure the attorney lives up to his duties; and
  • limiting the attorney’s ability to make gifts or changes to interest in the grantor’s property.

Butler suggests two additional safeguards: “The person you’ve named as your POA should not have the power to activate your POA document; nor should he or she have the power to ask for a capacity assessment.”

Rather, the client should specify two doctors to evaluate his mental capacity. This can prevent an opportunistic POA from influencing the outcome of that assessment.

Read: Coping with aging clients

Sue Foley, a CFP and retirement specialist with Hartry Foley Financial, Ltd. in Oakville, Ont., says she often spots the signs of dementia before her clients’ own kids do.

“I get a pretty good indication that my client is struggling by inconsistencies in how they handle their paperwork,” she says.

Foley says a good means of tracking mental competence is having older clients to fill out a questionnaire every six months, or once a year prior to review meetings.

Comparing answers with previous questionnaires can reveal tell-tale signs, such as whether they know what assets they own; their telephone numbers; and the names and birth dates of their children.

There are virtually no limits as to what can be added to a POA document. It can even name a financial advisor and state he or she must remain as the advisor of record in the event a client is deemed mentally incompetent.

And, it can give the right to choose a succeeding advisor—in the event of illness or death—to an accountant or lawyer, rather than to a family member who might engage in abuse.

Butler says her clients love this clause, because it gives them control in knowing someone will be watching their assets.

Read: When children and elderly parents change retirement plans

Add a comment

Have your say on this topic! Comments are moderated and may be edited or removed by
site admin as per our Comment Policy. Thanks!

See all comments Recent Comments


Great article, right up until the suggestion that the PoA lock down the advisor. That could be very costly in several instances. First, advisors age along with their clients and if there’s no provision for an alternate, the person purchasing the financial planners business may not be the person they would choose to continue with. Second, the choices made in the years leading up to dementia or Alzheimer’s or other forms of mental illness may not have been appropriate and now you’re saying those choices must be continued? Isn’t there provincial legislation that requires trustees to make competent choices? How can you tie their hands and require them to live with those choices? What if the PoA discovers fraud, or total incompetence in the handling of that person’s finances and taxes?

Monday, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:27 am Reply