The federal government appears to be doing away with a controversial tax policy interpretation that would have seen employees taxed for discounts they get at work.

Amid a growing controversy, a spokesman for the National Revenue Minister Diane Lebouthillier says the government will pull the new wording at the heart of the debate from the Canada Revenue Agency website.

John Power, press secretary, says the government is planning to hold an internal review on the wording change, which will be followed by a consultation on the issue with industry groups.

The decision to restore the old wording comes after strong objections from business associations that warned the change would lead to new taxes on retail workers, many of whom earn modest wages.

The industry groups also say the new wording would have created significant administrative burdens for employers, who would be required to track employee benefits.

Power says the original decision to change the wording in the document was made by CRA without the minister’s approval.

Lebouthillier insisted in a statement Tuesday that Ottawa was not targeting retail-sector workers.

Her office says it will ensure the former wording in the employer’s guide on the issue of employee benefits is reinstated.

Tax policy details

The update to the CRA documents first appeared in a tax folio and was later added to the agency’s employer’s guide.

The controversial change states that when an employee receives a discount on merchandise because of their employment, “the value of the discount is generally included in the employee’s income.”

It also says the value of the benefit is “equal to the fair market value of the merchandise purchased, less the amount paid by the employee.”

However, it notes that no amount will be included in the employee’s income if the discount is also available to the general public or to specific public groups.

“This document was not approved by the minister and we are deeply disappointed that the agency posted something that has been misinterpreted like this,” Power said Wednesday in an emailed statement.

“The agency issued a guidance document that does not reflect our government’s intentions, and the minister of national revenue has instructed officials to clarify the wording.”

Also read:

Why clients can’t rely on T-slips

Clients in the north getting more CRA support

CRA explains delay in fee position, previews folio on advantage rules

Originally published on
Add a comment

Have your say on this topic! Comments are moderated and may be edited or removed by
site admin as per our Comment Policy. Thanks!

See all comments Recent Comments


What motivates the CRA?
Is the CRA just doing its job, following orders from above?
Are there special incentives, like a bonus, if they find new ways to suck blood?
Do they regularly review their perks, with an eye on taxing some of them?

Why do they always go after the low hanging “fruit”, where the computer does all the work, and not go after the top 1%, or so, where for example, they own multiple primary residences and when they are sold they do not collect taxes due?

Am I the only one here, reading this, to have such a cynical view of the CRA?

Thursday, Oct 12, 2017 at 3:59 pm Reply