Multiple jurisdictions might mean multiple wills

By Akua Carmichael | September 1, 2009 | Last updated on September 1, 2009
4 min read

When advising clients on making a will, it isn’t uncommon to discover they have assets in foreign jurisdictions. That being the case, advisors need to know how to deal with issues that may arise from having overseas wealth.

Consider the following scenario. Mary is a Canadian citizen who lives in Ottawa but spends her winters in Florida, where she owns a condominium. Mary also owns property in France – part of an inheritance she received from her parents. Mary hasn’t yet prepared a will, but on your advice agrees to do so. She has questions about the distribution of her estate, and particularly, her foreign-owned assets. In advising Mary about her estate plan, what issues should you be aware of?

The main concern is whether one will is sufficient for Mary’s multiple assets. A will created in one jurisdiction and purporting to distribute assets in another may or may not be valid, depending on whether the will is accepted pursuant to the laws of the jurisdiction in which the asset is located. Issues concerning the domicile of the client, and whether the foreign-owned assets are real property or personal property must also be considered.

Let’s assume Mary makes a will in Ottawa, leaving her Florida condominium to her sister, Bianca. There are several possible consequences to that decision. Bianca may or may not receive the condominium depending on whether the will Mary made is in compliance with the law governing wills in Florida. If it turns out the will isn’t valid in Florida, an intestacy regarding the condominium will result. Whether Bianca receives the property will depend on the law in Florida governing property distribution when one dies without a will.

What the courts say

In the case of Granot v. Hersen, (1998, 21 E.T.R. (2d) 153), Henry Hersen, a Swiss and Canadian citizen, made a will three weeks before his death. Hersen owned property in Ontario and in Switzerland. In his will, he left the Ontario property to his son and a condominium in Switzerland to his daughter, although he did not specifically identify the condominium in his will. The court decided the rights to the Swiss property were to be determined by the internal law of Switzerland, which granted a one-fourth interest to Hersen’s son.

So even though an individual may attempt to distribute real property through a will, if it is in a foreign jurisdiction, the law governing the location of the property may prevail.

What options, then, does Mary or someone in a similar situation have? One thing Mary can do is make a separate will for each of her foreign-owned assets, in consultation with her lawyer, who must ensure each will complies with the law of the jurisdiction where the asset is located. In some circumstances, the lawyer will engage local counsel in the particular jurisdiction to draft or assist in drafting the will. If Mary finds herself in Florida and France regularly, she can create a will the next time she is in each location.

Mary might also consider making an international will recognized by the Succession Law Reform Act. An international will is valid as between the countries that are signatories to the Convention providing a uniform law on the form of an international will. Being a signatory to the convention means a will drafted and signed in any of the member countries and disposing of property located in any of those member countries will be accepted as valid, assuming it’s made in and complies with the form of an international will.

So, if Mary made and signed an international will in Ontario, leaving her French property to Bianca, there would be no issue as to whether French law or Canadian law would govern this distribution, or about the validity of Mary’s will. Most important, Mary’s wishes concerning the distribution of her property would be carried out.

Although the international will is an excellent response to dealing with many of these issues, it is not without its limitations. Only 12 countries have signed and ratified use of the convention. (These include Canada, Italy and France but not the United States).

And in Canada, while Ontario, Manitoba, Newfoundland, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia recognize the international will, British Columbia and Quebec do not.

So it’s important to be aware of the issues that arise when assisting clients who own assets in multiple jurisdictions, particularly if they intend to make a will. Prudent estate planners will ensure they have an understanding of the issues, and that their clients are well apprised of the options available to them.

Akua Carmichael is an independent estate lawyer and can be reached at editor@advisorsedgereport.com.

This article is not intended to serve as legal advice. It is for informational purposes only. If you feel you need legal advice, please obtain legal counsel concerning your individual situation.

Akua Carmichael headshot

Akua Carmichael

Akua Carmichael, LL.B, J.D., TEP, is director, tax and estate planning services, with Empire Life. Akua.Carmichael@empire.ca