Oil to remain strong in the near-term

By Steven Lamb | February 10, 2006 | Last updated on February 10, 2006
4 min read

(February 2006) Investors who enjoyed the massive upside to the energy rally were more than a little disappointed this past week, as the price of crude oil plummeted from over US$66 a barrel to $62, slashing 400 points off of the energy-heavy TSX Composite index.

Is the party over for the energy sector? It’s hard to imagine that prices will come down for oil, gas, coal or uranium, given that Mother Nature just isn’t making them as quickly as humanity can deplete reserves.

“It’s not that we’re running out of oil, natural gas, coal or even uranium for that matter. We’re running out of them at a cheap price,” says Jim Huang, vice president, Canadian Equities with Natcan Investment Management and manager of the Altamira Energy Fund.

In a recent report on the sector, CIBC World Markets reported that the world’s remaining oil and gas reserves may be so far out of reach that private enterprise on its own cannot afford to access them. This is where the Canadian oil sands come into play.

“There are no greater reserves accessible to private investment than the Canadian oil sands,” reads the report, penned by chief economist, Jeff Rubin and senior economist Peter Buchanan. “Deep-water wells may be the primary source of non-conventional production now, but by the end of the decade, slated production increases will make oil sands the single biggest contributor to incremental global supply.

“Planned capacity expansions in Canada’s oil sands even exceed planned increases in Saudi Arabia over the next decade.”

The report is critical of supply optimists, pointing out that depletion of reserves is often under-estimated or even ignored. Even the world’s largest oil companies are now expressing concern over depletion.

“Not only is depletion significant, but it is also accelerating, forcing more and more reliance on non-conventional sources of supply such as Canada’s vast but largely undeveloped oil sands,” Rubin and Buchanan write. “ExxonMobil has recently concluded that more than half of the hydrocarbon supplies needed over the next 15 years has yet to be developed.”

Based on their research, the CIBC team predicts oil will reach $100 a barrel by the end of 2007.

Maybe, says Huang, but the long term price of oil should be much lower even compared to today’s prices.

“The cure to high energy prices is high energy prices,” he says. “Given the right incentives, you’re going to find more supplies and that could potentially bring the price down. This will be corrected.”

He says the energy industry has been “so bad for so long” that no one was entering the business because of the high costs. The trend for companies that were in the business was to buy back stock during the boom-years, then use that equity to purchase new reserves. The problem with that model was the lack of exploration, which led to declining reserves. That decline in reserves eventually led to the current under-supply situation. At the same time, the global economy ramped up.

“I wouldn’t use the term shortage too lightly, but (we do) have a crunch,” he says. “What I like to look at is the underlying cost of finding new reserves and producing them. Allowing for a reasonable return, what price does it take to provide an incentive for people to do this?”

He admits that number is a moving target, but has come to the conclusion that equilibrium between supply and demand will be reached at about $45 a barrel, five years down the road. In the near-term, he expects crude to remain in the $60 to $70 range.

“It takes time for the situation to be corrected on the supply-demand side,” he says. “More and more, oil is coming from risky places — the Middle East, Russia and Venezuela, all these places that have issues other than just geological risk — so in the short term, the access to the resource is a problem and the risk of disruption is quite high.”

He says he would expect investors to exit the energy sector as the price falls, but once that level of equilibrium is reached, they will trickle back into the oilpatch. There are ways of going defensive within an energy mandate as stock prices slide, such as allocating more capital to cash, or to less volatile sectors such as the utilities companies that deliver the energy. Huang says the third option is to choose larger cap stocks, as they are best able to weather a downturn.

“At the end of the day, when you’re in a sector fund you’re there to try to make your best return, given the risk,” he says. “If you want to put you money in an energy fund, you have to have a belief that over you investment horizon, energy will do well. If you don’t believe that, then you shouldn’t be in an energy fund.”

Filed by Steven Lamb, Advisor.ca, steven.lamb@advisor.rogers.com

(02/10/06)

Steven Lamb